Determinants of Group Participation: Option and Impact of Farmers’ Participation in Groups in Mbozi District

Authors

  • Deogratias Lwezaura
  • Deus Ngaruko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61538/ajer.v1i2.191

Abstract

This paper explores factors that determine farmers’ participation in groups in Mbozi district, Tanzania. Cross-section data used were obtained from face-to-face interviews from a sample of  310 households and 21 farmer groups. Analysis was done by using non-linear logit model and Instrumental Variable. The findings show that type of group, trustworthiness, transaction cost, marital status and the kind of institution initiating group formation are significant determinants of farmers’ participation in groups. The results further show that the average expected income accrued from group participation is Tanzanian Shillings 87,768 more than that obtained by nonparticipants.

Author Biographies

Deogratias Lwezaura

Division of Research and Development, Ministry of Agriculture Food Security and Cooperative  Box 2066, Dar es Salaam

Deus Ngaruko

Department of Economics, The Open University of Tanzania, Box 23409,  Dar es Salaam

References

Barham J. and Chitemi C. (2008). Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance. Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania. CGIAR systematic program on collective action and property rights. Working Paper No. 74.

Basu A., Heckman J., and Navarro-Lozano S. U.(2007). Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: An application in breast cancer patients. Health Econometrics and Data Group Working Paper 07/07, The University of York

Bertus W. and Heemskerk W. (2006). “Farmers’ organizations and agricultural innovation: Case studies from Benin, Rwanda and Tanzania†Bulletin 374, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT) – Amsterdam, KIT Development, Policy and Practice.

Fischer E., Matin Q. (2011) “Smallholder Farmers and Collective Action: What Determines the

Intensity of Participation?†Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference,

Heckman, J. (1995) “Randomization as an instrumental variable,†Review of Economics and Statistics 77(2):336 – 341.

Luis F. M. (2007) A unified theory of collective action and social change. The University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor.

Maddala, G. S. (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press

Nkuba J. (2007) Assessing adoption and economic impacts of new banana varieties on livelihoods of farmers in Kagera region, Tanzania. A PhD thesis – Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro – Tanzania

Pascal C. S., Tumwine J. and Lilja N.K. (2001)Patterns of participation in farmers’ research groups: Lessons from the highlands of southwestern Uganda1International Center for Tropical Agriculture, CIAT, Kampala, Uganda;African Highlands Ecoregional Programme (AHI),

Kabale, Uganda CGIAR System Wide Programme on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis (PRGA), Cali, Colombia

Shiferaw B, Silim S., Muricho G., Audi P., Mligo J., You L., Christiansen J. (2005). Assessment of the adoption and impact of improved pigeonpea varieties in Tanzania. International Crop Research Institute for Semi-Arid. Working Paper Series no. 21

Willer Robb (2009), A status theory of collective action, in Shane R. Thye, Edward J. Lawler (ed.) Altruism and Prosocial Behavior in Groups (Advances in Group Processes, Volume 26), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.133-163

Downloads

Published

2013-07-01