Determinants of Transaction Costs to Farmers Participation in Groups from Mbozi District in Tanzania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61538/ajer.v1i1.195Abstract
Farmers are often encouraged to form producer groups to facilitate their access to markets in an effort to overcome transaction costs and enjoy economies of scale, which is often advocated in the collective action literature. The role of transaction costs in participation of smallholder farmers groups is attempts that underpin the present paper. The study uses a cross-section data of a sample size of 310 farmers collected from Mbozi District of Tanzania. They include variables capturing transaction costs on farmers’ participation in groups. A model that can be used to capture elements of transaction costs while explaining influences for farmers’ participation in groups is specified and used in the analysis. Variables capturing transaction costs explaining decisions costs (including information gathering, contracting and negotiating) of farmers to participate in groups are demonstrated and used in the analysis. In light of transaction cost literature only three variables that show significant effect include registration fee or cost of joining a group, distance that captures access to a group meeting place and membership to a market oriented group. Based on the findings, we conclude that policies focusing to lowering transaction costs through improved transportation, lowering participation fee and promotion of marketing oriented farmer groups would increase farmers’ decision to participate in groups and increase group participants. ÂReferences
Barham, J., Chitemi, C.(2009). Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance:
lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania. Food Policy 34(1), 53-59.
Bienable E., Coronel C., Le Coq J.F.and Liagre L. (2004). Linking small holder farmers to markets: Lessons learned from literature review and analytical review of selected projects. World Bank, Final Report
Coase, R.H. (1960). The problem os social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(10): 1-44.
Divine Foundjem Tita., (2009). A transaction cost analysis of factors affecting market arrangements in the agroforestry tree product value chain in Cameroon. MSc Thesis in Rural Development, Ghent University, Belgium,
Dyer J. H (1997). Effective Interfirm collaboration: How firms minimise transaction cost and maximise transaction value. Strategic management journal Vol. 21: 563-576
Fraval P. (2000). Eléments pour l'analyse économique des filières agricoles en Afrique SubSaharienne. Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, DGCID, Paris.
Foti Richard, Ignatius Govere, Edward Mutandwa, Patrice Mugenzi & Nyararai Mlambo (2009). Determinants of participation in pest management groups by smallholder cotton producers in
Zimbabwe. ISSN 1993–8225. International NGO Journal Vol. 4 (5), pp. 203-206,
Garfamy R. M. (2004). Transaction cost approach to supply chain. Autonomus university of Barcelona. Available from http://www.scribd.com/doc/5052276/Transaction-Cost-ApproachtoSupply-Chain consulted Feb 22, 2009.
Glenn D., Israel (2009). Determining sample size. Agricultural Education and Communication
Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication: November 1992. Reviewed April 2009. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu
Hayes D. (2000). Transaction cost economics and the evolving structure of agricultural production. In E- Commerce in Agribusiness Schimtz, T.G. , C. B. Moss, A. Schmitz, Kagan A.
and Babcock B. Florida (eds): Florida Science Source.
Hobbs J. E. (1995). Evolving Marketing Channels for Beef and Lamb in the United Kingdom a transaction cost approach. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing Vol.7:4.
Karki, Lila Bahadur & Bauer, Siegfried (2004). Technology Adoption and Household Food Security. Analyzing factors determining technology adoption and impact of project intervention:
A case of smallholder peasants in Nepal. Paper of the proceeding presented in The Deutscher
Tropentag held on 5 - 7 October, 2004, Humboldt-University, Berlin. Tech-adoptropen-1.doc Graham R. Marshall (2009). What does ‘community’ mean for farmer adoption of conservation practices? Some logic and evidence. Rural futures, university of New England, ustralia, June 2009. Occasional Paper 2009/01
Makhura, M., Kirsten, J., & Delgado, C., (2001). Transaction costs and smallholder participation in the maize market in the Northern province of South Africa. Proceedings of the seventh Eastern and Southern Africa regional conference, 11-15 February 2001, pp 463-467. Pretoria, South Africa.
Ngaruko D.D. (2010). Transaction Cost and their implication on Agrocredit Supply Arrangements in Western Tanzania. HURIA Journal Volume VIII, August 2010, Pp1-26
Poulton, C., Dorward, A., and Kydd, J., 2010. The future of small farms: New directions for Services, institutions, and intermediation. World Development 38(10), 1413-1428.
Romanik C. T. (2008). An Urban-rural focus on food markets in Africa, The urban institute. Source: http://www.urban.org | © 2008 The urban institute.
Verhaegen I. and Van Huylenbroeck G. (2002). Hybrid governance structures for quality farm products: a transaction cost perspective. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Williamson O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking stock looking ahead. Journal of economic literature, Vol. 38: 595-613.
