Challenges Facing Supervisors and Students in the Process of Writing Theses/Dissertations under ODL: Experiences from The Open University of Tanzania

Authors

  • Magreth Bushesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v12i0.114

Abstract

This paper discusses problems facing supervisors and students in writing dissertations/theses. The paper refers to the Open University of Tanzania (OUT) as the case study. Data were collected using formal meetings, questionnaire administration and documentary analysis. The data from the questionnaire were analysed by the help of the Scientific Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) while the qualitative data were analysed through content and thematic analysis. The paper established that communication, supervisorstudent relationship, access to literature, plagiarism, and poor writing skills among some students are some of the key challenges facing students and supervisors in writing dissertations/theses at OUT. The paper recommends that communication between students and supervisors need to be strengthened through both parties abiding by professionalism. Strengthening the use of progress reports and arrangement of supervision seminars more frequently would minimize problems related to miscommunication. Students are encouraged to maximally utilize online sources of literature. The use of internet would also reduce unnecessary delays of supervisors’ feedback. The Open University of Tanzania needs to revise payments for supervisors so that supervisors are motivated to timely accomplish their tasks.

Author Biography

Magreth Bushesha

The Open University of Tanzania, P. O. Box 23409, Dar Es Salaam.

References

Burnett, P. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertation using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education and

Supervision, 39(1), 46-52.

Dabbs, J. M. (1982). ‘Making things visible’. In VanMaanen, J. (ed.). Varieties of qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Deem, R. and Brehony, K.V. (2000) Doctoral students’ access to research cultures – are some more unequal than others?, Studies in Higher Education, 25(2): 149–165.

Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. and Parry, O. (2004) Supervising the doctorate: a guide to success. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.

Dietz A. J.,Jansen J. D., and Wadee A. A (2006), Effective PhD Supervision and Mentorship. A work book based on experiences from South Africa and the Netherlands. Rozenberg Publishers (Amsterdam)-UNISA Press (Pretoria).

Dillon, M. J., & Malott, R. W. (1981). Supervising master’s thesis and doctoral dissertations. Teaching and Psychology, 8(3), 195-202.

Hockey, J. (1995), Change and the social science PhD: supervisors’ responses. Oxford Review of Education, 21(2): 195–206.

Garcia, M. E., Mallot, R. W., & Brethower, D. (1988). A system of thesis and dissertation supervision: Helping graduate students succeed, Teaching of Psychology, 7, 89-92.

Hockey, J. (1996), Strategies and tactics in the supervision of UK social science PhD students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4): 481– 500.

(http//www.otago001975.html supervision.htm - accessed on 20/12/2011)

OUT, (2010) The Open University of Tanzania Facts and Figures. Published by the Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) 22-26pp

OUT, (2011), Prospectus 2011/2012 The Open University of Tanzania,

Dar es Salaam

OUT (2010) Prospectus 2010/2011 The Open University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam.

Robson, C (2000) Real World Research. Blackwell publishers, UK.

Walliam N. (2006) Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications London

Rudd, E. (1985). A new look at post graduate failure. Guildford, England: SRHE and Slough: NFER Nelson

Downloads

Published

2012-10-12