Comparative Economic Analysis of Beekeeping Using Traditional and Improved Beehives in the Miombo Woodlands of Tabora and Katavi Regions, Tanzania

Authors

  • N. M. Kuboja1

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v22i0.66

Abstract

The study was carried out in Tabora and Katavi regions in the miombo woodlands of Tanzania. The overall objective of the study was to undertake a comparative economic analysis of beekeeping using improved or traditional beehives. Data were collected from 198 beekeepers that were randomly selected from a sampling frame of 237 beekeepers using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA) along with budgetary analysis and profitability ratios. The findings revealed that improved beehives were more productive than traditional beehives, although both beekeeping systems were profitable ventures. However, beekeepers who used traditional beehives realized higher net farm incomes than those who used improved beehives. Return on investment was estimated to be 3.7% per shilling for beekeepers using traditional beehives against 1.3, 0.3 and 0.8% for those using Tanzania Top Bar, Box and Longstroth (improved beehives), respectively. The lower gains associated with improved beehives that are more productive than traditional ones, are most likely to be a result of failures within the market system to value and reward quality.  Earnings for adopters of these productivity enhancing beehives could increase if new mechanisms that allow fair pricing of high-quality honey extracted from such beehives are instituted in local markets. These endeavours could be pioneered by relevant institution including local government and non-governmental organizations in respective areas.  

Author Biography

N. M. Kuboja1

1Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Tumbi Agricultural Research Institute, Tabora, Tanzania

References

Abdullahi, A., Isekenegbe, J. and Mohammed, U.S. (2014). Comparative economic analysis of modern and traditional bee-keeping in Lere and Zaria local government areas of Kaduna State, Nigeria

Attri, P.K., Verma, S. and Meenakshi, T. (2010). Mountain Hills Beekeeping and Its Economic Efficiency of District Chamba (Himachal Pradesh). ASIAN J. EXP. BIOL. SCI. 1 (1): 96-100

Cristina, B.P. and Anca, A.P. (2012). Types of Beekeeping Practiced in the

North West Region of Romania: Advantages and Disadvantages. Bulletin UASVM Horticulture 69 (2):111-666

Fan, M., Shen, J., Yuan, L., Jiang, R., Chen, X., Davies, W. J. and Zhang, F. (2012). Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. Journal of Experimental Botany 63 (1): 13-24.

Fisher, M. and Kandiwa, V. (2014). Can agricultural input subsidies reduce the gender gap in modern maize adoption? Evidence from Malawi. Food

Policy, 45, 101-111.

Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F. and Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967): 812-818.

Hausser, Y. and Mpuya, P. (2004). Beekeeping in Tanzania: when the bees get out of the woods… An innovative cross sectoral approach to community based natural resource management. Game and Wildlife Science, 21(3): 291-312.

Koundouri, P., Nauges, C. and Tzouvelekas, V. (2006). Technology adoption under production uncertainty: theory and application to irrigation technology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(3): 657-670.

Kurkalova, L., Kling, C. and Zhao, J. (2006). Green subsidies in agriculture: Estimating the adoption costs of conservation tillage from observed behavior. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 54(2): 247-267.

Lalika, M. C. S. and Machangu, J. S. (2008). Beekeeping for income generation and coastal forest conservation in Tanzania. Bee for development journal No. 88.

Langyintuo, A. S. and Mekuria, M. (2005). Accounting for neighborhood influence in estimating factors determining the adoption of improved agricultural technologies. In A paper at American Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting, providence, Rode Island (pp. 1-28).

Mbah, S. O. (2012). Profitability of Honey production enterprise in Umuahia Agricultural Zone of Abia Satae, Nigeria. International Journal of agriculture and rural development, 15(3): 1268-1274.

Mickels-kokwe, G. (2006). Small scale woodland-based enterprises without standing economic potential: The case of honey in Zambia. Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) 94pp

Mkamba, G.A. (2006). Analysis of Factors Affecting Marketing of Honey in Tabora and Dar es Salaam Regions

Mlingwa, C. and Mwakatobe, A. (2004). Bee Products Marketing in Tanzania

MMA (2007). Honey and Beeswax Value Chain Analysis in Tanzania

MNRT (1998). National Beekeeping policy. Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism. Dar-es-Salaam

Mohammed, R.J.S. and Abdurrahman, Y.H.E. (2004). A comparative Analysis of Bee keeping and crop production in Nigeria. Available at: www.apiservice.com/apimandia/2revisedbeekeepingcrops2006.doc.

(visted on 10th July, 2014).

Moser, C. M. and Barrett, C. B. (2003). The disappointing adoption dynamics of a yield-increasing, low external-input technology: the case of SRI in Madagascar. Agricultural Systems, 76(3): 1085-1100.

Mpanda District Council (2012). District Crops and Livestock production status Annual Report. Mpanda District council, Mpanda, Katavi. 89pp

Nkonjera, J.M. (2010). Adoption of Improved Beekeeping technologies and contribution to the income of local community in Mpanda district, Tanzania. Dissertation for Award of MSc Degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 72pp.

Onwumere, J., Onwukwe, F. and Alamba, C.S. (2012). Comparative Analyses of Modern and Traditional Bee Keeping Entrepreneurships in Abia State, Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3 (13): 333-678

Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F. and Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Animal Production Science, 46(11): 14071424.

Pretty, J. N., Noble, A. D., Bossio, D., Dixon, J., Hine, R. E., Penning de Vries, F. W. and Morison, J. I. (2006). Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environmental science and technology, 40(4): 1114-1119.

Sikonge District Council (2012). District Crops and Livestock production status Annual Report. Sikonge District council, Sikonge, Tabora. 127pp

Swai, R.E. and Oduol, P.A. (2003). Apiculture and Agroforestry in the Miombos Western Tanzania: An Overview of the Bee Industry in Tanzania

TAWIRI (1997). Appropriate Design of Top Bar Hives

TAWIRI (1998). Surveys of Local and Economic Value of Bee Products in Same Tanzanian tribes

TAWIRI (2002). Market Awareness on bee Products

TAWIRI (2004). Participation of Women and Youth in Beekeeping activities in Manyoni district, Singida, Tanzania

TAWIRI (2006). Different Types of Bee Colonies in Seven Zones of Tanzania

Tijani, B.A., Iheanacho, A.C. and Shehu, H. (2010). Analysis of Scio-economic Factors Influencing the Intensity of Use of Integrated Weed Control Method for Selected Crops in Marte Local Government Area of Borno

State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment 12(1): 1-11

Urambo District Council (2012). District Crops and Livestock production status Annual Report. Urambo District council, Urambo, Tabora. 156pp.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-22