Students’ Perception on the Quality of Open and Distance Learning Programmes in Tanzania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v18i0.15Abstract
A controversial topic in higher education today revolves around the enormous growth of distance education. The issues surrounding quality of distance education have been discussed and debated by many different parties. Regardless of who is interested in this unique educational environment that distance education establishes, “all stress the need to have a better understanding of what contributes to quality†in distance education programmes. This study aimed at assessing the quality of open and distance learning programmes from students‟ point of view. The sample was drawn from the Open University of Tanzania‟s students in nine University regional centres from Tanzania mainland and it constituted 305 students. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed, since there is no single technique which is necessarily superior over the others. The factors assessed ranged from registration procedures, accesses to course instructors, administrative processes, course materials, instructional methods, clarity of syllabus, exam processes and the like. The findings showed that about 71.5% students have a positive perception on the overall quality of distance education in Tanzania. About 63.6% of participants were very likely to recommend open and distance learning to others, while 34.8% were somewhat likely to do so. The major weaknesses found were insufficiency of study material, internet services and academic staff in regional centres. The study therefore concludes that quality of higher education via open and distance learning is achieved by demonstrating that the quality of content, delivery, assessment and outcomes in ODL institutions is equal to, or better than, the traditional forms of education.References
Arnould, E.J., Price L.L., and Zinkhan G.M. (2002). Consumers. Chicago, IL: McGraw- Hill. Ashalatha, J (1990). Perceptions of learners about distance education. M.Phil Dissertation, Hyderabad: Osmania University. Best, J., and Kahn, J. (2006). Research in education (10th Ed). Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Bhalalusesa, Eustella (n.d). An Appraisal of research and evaluation in distance education; the Tanzanian experience. Brennan, J., and Shah, T. (Eds.). (2000). Managing quality in higher education. Milton Keynes: OECD, SRHE & Open University Press. Corry, M. (2008). Quality in distance learning. Distance Learning, 5(1), 8891.Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education Ltd. Cummins, J. and Sayers, D. 1996. Multicultural Eeucation and technology: promise and pitfalls. In Multicultural Education , Vol. 3, No. 3 (Spring): 4–10. Dodds, T. and Edirishingha, P. (2000). Organisational and delivery structures. In Yates, C and Bradley, J., Eds., Basic Education at a Distance: World Review of Distance Education and Open Learning,Vol. 2. London and New York: Routledge Falmer. Easton, S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor's role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52(2), 87. Gagne. M. and Shephered, M. ( 2001). A comparison between a distance and traditional graduate accounting class.T.H.E journal 28(9). Retrieved From http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A3433.cfm Gearhart, D. (2001). Ethics in distance education: Developing ethical policies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(1). Retrieved April 22, 2008, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring41/gearhart 41.html Gibbs, G. and Durbridge, N. (1976). Characteristics of Open University tutors. Teaching at a Distance, 7. Guri-Rosenblit, S. (n.n). Distance and campus universities: tensions and interactions. Oxford: Pergamon Press & International Association of Universities. Harry, K. (1999). Higher education through open and distance learning. London: Routledge. Holmberg, B. (1989). Growth and structure of distance education. London: Croom Helm. Holmberg, B. (1995). Theory and practice of distance education. London: Routledge. Jones, A. and Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer supported collaborative learning. In Computers and Education, 44(4), (pp. 395-408). Keegan, D. (1986). The foundations of distance education. London: Routledge. Keegan, D. (1995). Distance education technology for the new millennium: compressed video teaching. ZIFF Papiere. Hagen, Germany: Institute for Research into Distance Education. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389 931). Keegan, D (Ed.) (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. Kolesar, M.B. and Galbraith, R.W. (2000). A services-marketing perspective on eretailing: Implications for e-retailers and directions for further research. Internet Research : Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10 (5), 424-438 Komba W.L.M. (2009). Increasing education access through open and distance learning in Tanzania: A critical review of approaches and practices. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2009, Vol. 5, Issue 5, pp.8-21
Koul, B. N. (1987). A study of dropouts: Implications for administrative and educational strategies. New Delhi, Unpublished paper. Lawi, Y. and Said, A. (n.d). Examination security in universities in Tanzania: The case of Open University of Tanzania. OUT: unpublished. Manohar, M. (1995). Learners‟ profile and perceptions in management programme- a comperative study. Paper presented at VIII Anuual Coference of Asian Association of Open Universities. IGNOU: New Delhi. Mehrotra, C.M., Hollister, C.D. & McGahey, L. (2001). Distance learning: Principles for effective design, delivery, and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. Mushi, P.A.K. (1998). ―Community – based Adult education interventions in Tanzania‖ in Papers in Education and Development No. 19 Novak, R. J. (2002). Benchmarking distance education. New Directions for Higher Education, 118, 79-92. Peat J. and Helland, K. (2002). Perceptions of distance learning and the effects on selection decisions. Available: http://bus.utk.edu/iopsyc/pdf/Perceptions-ofDistance-Education-siop2003.pdf Ramsden, P. (1992). Teaching and learning in higher education. London: Routledge. Richardson, C.J. and Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning & satisfaction. In Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), (pp. 6888). Schellens, T. and Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. In Computers & Education, 46(4), (pp. 349-370). Schmidt, B. and Faulkner, S. (1989). Staff development through distance education. The Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 2-9. Sherry, A.C. (2003). Quality and its measurement in distance education. In M.G. Moore and W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 435-459). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Stone, T. E. (1992). A new look at the role of locus of control in completion rates in distance education. Research in Distance Education. Suzanne, St. Pierre and Larry K. Olsen (1999). Student perspectives on the effectiveness of correspondence instruction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3). Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory: further insights in autonomysupportive and controlling teaching styles. Paper presented at the International Conference on Motivation ‗Cognition, Motivation and Effect‘, Lisbon, Portugal. Vroeijenstijn, A.I. (1995). Governments and university: opponents or allies in quality assurance? Higher Education Review, London, Vol. 27, No. 3 Zirkin, B., and Sumler, D. (1995). Interactive or non-interactive? That is the question! An annotated bibliography. Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 95-112.
