Building Competitive Advantage in Academic Programmes in Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Institutions: Case of The Open University of Tanzania

Authors

  • Deus D Ngaruko
  • Leonard L.W.T Fweja
  • Fauzia M. Mohammed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v18i0.16

Abstract

The determinants that affect competitiveness of ODL Higher Learning Institutions (ODL-HLI) can loosely be lumped up as being either from within the organization itself, or from the market. These include: student enrollment trends, staff development, academic trends, technology trends and economic trends among others. These challenges can be viewed and used as a way of planning ahead; and as important pointers in assessing the institution‟s performance. The determinants should highlight where the institution is doing well and needs to guard its market competitive advantage as well as indicate where there are weaknesses that need to be addressed in order to gain a competitive advantage of the higher education market.  In order to maintain its market position, the paper presses greater importance on investments in ICT enhanced education delivery and sharing systems, improved customer service and greater publicity on all media and in particular through improved visibility and quality of the institution‟s website. The paper however, suggests that greatest competitive advantage for ODL-HLIs such as OUT‟s is hidden in its postgraduate programmes. The paper stresses that improved quality and completion rates of research and postgraduate students in business, law, economics, and education and applied natural sciences should become new market niche for ODL-HLIs.

Author Biographies

Deus D Ngaruko

The Open University of Tanzania

Leonard L.W.T Fweja

The Open University of Tanzania

Fauzia M. Mohammed

The Open University of Tanzania

References

Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17 (1). Cho D.S. (1998). From National Competitiveness to Bloc and Global Competitiveness. Competitiveness Review, v 8 (1).

Devinney, T. (1997 September/October). Development Programme for Managers. Eckert, E. (2003). Review New Directions for adult and continuing education: Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively. Adult Basic Education. 13(1):62-64.

Hall, Richard (1993). A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14 (8). Hoffman, Nicole P. (2000). An Examination of the ―Sustainable Competitive Advantage‖ Concept: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Marketing Science Review, v 2000 (4). http://www.tcu.go.tz/statistics.html

Howell, S. L, Williams, P. B and Lindsay, N. K (2003). ‗Thirty-two Trends Affecting Distance Education: An Informed Foundation for Strategic Planning‘ in Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3). Lattimer, Robert (2003). The New Age of Competitivenes. Competitiveness Review, Vol. 13 (2).

Lambat Anak Lindong (2007). ―A cross-case study of the competitive advantage of private higher educational institutions in Kuching, Sarawak.‖ A thesis submitted at Universiti sains Malaysia Linder, S. (1961). An Essay on Trade and Transformation. New York: Wiley. Ljubojevic, Cedomir (2003). ―Corporate Competence—the Basis of Achieving Competitive Advantage of Services Business on the Global Market‖, Paper presented to conference on Globalization and Entrepreneurship: fears, Challenges and Opportunities, Pula, Croatia, April 24-26, 2003. Luo, Yadong (2000). Dynamic Capabilities in International Expansion, Journal of World Business, Vol. 35 (4). Porter, Michael E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press. Porter, Michael E. (1990a). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, March-April.

Building Competitive Advantage in Academic Programmes in ODL Deus Ngaruko., Leonard L.W.T Fweja and Fauzia M. Mohamed

Porter, Michael E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy, Harvard Business Review , December. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June. Peter Msolla (n.d.). Issues of higher Education in Tanzania http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBISFP/Resources/0_Prof_Msolla.pdf West, G.B. (1999). Teaching and technology in higher education: Changes and challenges. Adult Learning,16-18.

Downloads

Published

2014-11-18