Quality Assurance in Modules at the Institute of Distance Education, the University of Zambia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v13i0.75Abstract
Albeit distance education currently focuses attention on the use of Internet and elearning facilities, these cannot overtake the importance of using the printed modules. It therefore follows that the quality of these printed modules which are by and large used as instructional materials must be of high quality. To the contrary the printed modules that are used at the Institute of Distance Education at the University of Zambia have for a long time never been reviewed to ascertain their quality. In fact these modules are more of batches than they are modules. This study aimed to close this overt gap by assessing the quality of the modules used in all programmes of study having in mind the inevitable need to improve them. Data was collected in 2009/2010 from 1,107 students drawn from all of degree programme courses by way of using a questionnaire designed by the researcher. The data were analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) from which frequency distributions and averages were obtained. It was found out that students were not satisfied with the quality of the modules. They indicated that the modules were less interactive, the language used was not appropriate to the learners, the font sizes and types were not in line with the learning materials being used. The conclusions made were that it is inevitable to improve the modules by ensuring that these were made interactive. Some of the measures that needed to be taken were that of pre-testing of the modules, training of course writers and editors. It would also be useful to encourage teamwork when producing the modulesReferences
Astleitner, H. (2003). The quality of instructional materials for argumentative knowledge construction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, March 2003 issue.
Commonwealth of Learning (COL) (2004). Planning and Implementing Open and Distance Learning Systems: a Handbook for Decision Makers. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.
Distance Education and Training Council (DETC) (2004). DETC Accreditation Handbook – 2004. Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education Council: Washington, DC.
Freeman, Richard (2004). Planning and Implementing Open and Distance Learning Systems: A Handbook for Decision Makers. Vancouver: The Commonwealth of Learning.
Gulati, S. (2008). Technology – Enhanced Learning in Developing Nations: A review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1).
Holmberg, B. (2005). The Evolution, Principles and Practices of Distance Education. German: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.
Institute of Distance Education (2010). “Policy Guidelines and Collaboration between IDE and Conventional Faculties/Departmentsâ€. Unpublished Policy Paper for the
University of Zambia.
Keegan, D. (2001). Foundation of Distance Education. Third Edition. London: Routledge Falmer.
Library Media and Instructional Materials Services and its licensors (2004). “Instructional
Materials Handbookâ€. Miami-Dade Country Public Schools. Retrieved December 6,
, from http://www.library.dadeschools.net/im/selection.htm.
Librero, F. (2004). Distance Education in UP: Options and Directions. Paper produced for the University of the Philippines Open University. Los Banos: UP Open University. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://www.UPOU. ORG/books/options.htm
MacDonald-Ross, M. (1977). Graphics in text. In Shulman, L. S. (ed.), Review of Research in Education 5, Itasca, IL.: F. E. Peacock.
Melton, R. F. (2002). Planning and Development Open and Distance Learning: A Quality
Assurance Approach. London: Routledge Falmer.
Mokocho, P. M. O. K. (2001). “An overview of the quality, readability and relevance of Distance Education Instructional Modules at Domasi College of Education (Malawi) – a teacher – learner’s perspectiveâ€. Paper presented at the Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, Durban, South Africa, 29 July – 2 August, 2002.
Moore, M. and Kersley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A Systems View. Belmont California: Wadsworth.
Moore, M. (1972). Learner autonomy: the second dimension of independent Learning. Convergence, 5(2): 76 – 78.
Mugridge, I. (2006). Quality Assurance in Open and Distance Education. In Garg, S.: Khan, A. R.: Aggarwal, A. K.: Kanjilal, U & Panda, S. (ed). Open and Flexible Learning – Issues and Challenges. Prof. G. Ram Reddy memorial Lecturers, New Delhi: Viva Books Private Limited.
Perraton, H. (2004). Well-trodden routes and mountains still to climb. Paper presented at the DEASA Meeting held in Maseru, Lesotho, September, 2004.
Peter, O. (2001). Learning and Teaching in Distance Education – Pedagogical Analyses and Interpretations in an International Perspective. London: Kogan Page.
Potashnik, M. and Capper, J. (1998). “Distance Education: Growth and Diversityâ€. Finance
and Development, March 1998. Retrieved December 10, 2004, from http://www.worldbank.org/fandd/english/0398/articles/0110398.htm South African Institute of Distance Education (SAIDE), (2003). “Minimum Targets for Distance Education in South Africa – 2003â€. Unpublished Paper, (Johannesburg:
SAIDE).
Sukati, C. W. S.: Vilakati, L. D and Sithole, S. I. (2002). Factors Contributing to Poor Attendance of Classes by the Students of the Institute of Distance Education at the University of Swaziland, BOLESWA Educational Research Journal 19, 44 – 58.
Waller, R. (1982). Text as diagram: Using typography to improve access and understanding. In: Jonassen, D. H. (ed). The technology of text: Principles for designing and displaying text, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Educational Technology publications.
Wood, D. G. et al. (2004). Total Quality Management Strategic Plan for Distance Course Development. DEOSNEWS, 13(2).
Sub-theme Two: E-Learning and Open Educational Resources (OERs)
The Role of Mobile Phone Learning In Escalating Access to Open Educational
Resources (OER) In Developing Countries
Zainab RUHWANYA, Grace MBWETE And Magreth MUSHI, The Open University of Tanzania
Trajectories of attaining and sustaining quality in e-learning
Chiome Chrispen and Chabaya Owence
Zimbabwe Open University,
Cost-Benefit of E-Learning under ODL of Developing Economies
Magaji, S. Department of Economics, University of Abuja, Nigeria Adelabu, J. S. A. University of Abuja,
Mobile Technologies for Enhancing Distance Learning in Tanzania: An Exploratory
Study
Ezra K. Maritim and Honoratha M. K. Mushi
Open University of Tanzania, Tanzania
A quest for increased interactivity in the print instructional resources of ODL institutions in Africa: Writing the study units of NOUN print course materials Felix E. Gbenoba, NOUN
The Impact of ICTS Diffusion on Mdgs and Baroclinic Digital Learning Environments in East and Southern Africa
Prof. Gabriel Kabanda
Zimbabwe Open University
Potential Students’ Perceptions on Online Learning as Innovation
Dr. Honoratha M. K. Mushi
The Open University of Tanzania
Online learning for social constructivism: creating a conducive environment
Lydia Mbati
University of South Africa
