A Quest for Increased Interactivity in the Print Instructional Resources of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Institutions in Africa: Writing the Study Units of National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) Print Course Materials

Authors

  • Felix E. Gbenoba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v13i0.80

Abstract

Learning resources (mainly self-instructional materials, SIMs) remain the most important pedagogic tool in the open and distance learning (ODL) mode. The SIM character is for learners to study with minimum physical or face-to-face contact with the teacher. Distance learning in Africa has however, for the most part been delivered by the operating institutions as part-time learning especially with the increase in required contact hours. This is obviously a quest for the learners to have a dose of the interactivity that is missing in the pseudo-conventional ‘textbooks’ instead of SIMs, made available to them. The existing print course materials should be modified by interrogating the contents. A comprehensive content review would for instance reveal the inadequate interactivity in the print course materials made available to learners at present. As SIMs, the print course materials which are the most pervasive means of instructional resource delivery in African ODL institutions at present need an increased dose of interactivity. This paper will examine the language in selected print course materials of the National Open University of Nigeria, identify their inadequacies in interactivity and suggest ways of making them more interactive against a conceptual framework of communication theory

Author Biography

Felix E. Gbenoba

National Open University of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria

References

Abubakar Kudur et al. (2010). Nigerian People and Culture. University of Maiduguri Distance Learning Centre.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.

IGNOU, Self-Instructional Course Units. (1989). IGNOU Handbook 5. New Delhi.

Kozak, M, (2009). “Text-table: an underused and undervalued tool for communicating information.†In European Science Editing a journal of the European Association of Science Editors. 35(4) November. 103-105.

Kumar, A. (2010). “Development of Evaluation Criteria for Self Instructional Materials for

Distance Education.†In Journal of Distance Education. Pp57-68. www.cemca.org/disted/Kumar_Anil0284.pdf. Retrieved on July 21, 2010.

Lewis, R. (1981). “How to write self-study material.†Cambridge: Council for Educational

Technology.

Lockwood, F. (1997). “Developing Self-Instructional Material for Open, Distance and Flexible.â€

Pre ICDE Conference workshop report. Pennsylvania State University.

National Universities Commission. (2009). Guidelines for Open and Distance Learning in Nigerian Universities.October.

Rowntree, D. (1986) Teaching through Self-instruction. London: Kogan Page and Nichola Publication Company.

Thurmond, V. (2003). Examination of Interaction variables as Predictors of Students’

satisfaction and willingness to enroll in further Web-based courses while controlling for student characteristics. Published Dissertation. University of Kansas. Parkland FL: Dissertation.com. Available online. www.dissertation.com/library/11218149.htm.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Pre

Downloads

Published

2012-08-13