Online Learning for Social Constructivism: Creating a Conducive Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v13i0.83Abstract
On-line learning is a process which is facilitated through the use of the Internet and the World Wide Web. It has the potential for stimulating learning on a social constructivist paradigm given the wide range of applications available on the Internet and the web. The social constructivist paradigm is associated with creative thinking and problem solving through collaborative learning. In spite of this, problems related to the practice act as impediments to effective on-line learning in some higher education institutions. This integrative literature review examines the findings of qualitative research articles regarding impediments to effective online learning.  Five primary research articles published between 2000 and 2010 serve as the source of data for the study and recommendations based on literature are presented as possible solutions to the identified problems. The article used as its theoretical basis Garrison’s Community of Inquiry. The study makes recommendations that may address the problems prevalent in the practice of on-line learning. These recommendations may serve as a marker for academic planners and policy makers who are involved with the creation of effective on-line learning environmentsReferences
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chang, S. (2006). “Are they willing to contribute? Prosumer characteristics among the Australian youthâ€. Paper presented at Digital Natives in Australia and Korea.
Conference at the University of Melbourne, 2006.
Chavez, H., Sanchez, P., Telha, C., Puelles, C. and A.Thielemann (2002). Applications of Internet to teaching-learning through the use of web pages. Pharmacy Education, 2(4), 205-208.
Chenail, R. (2009). Bringing method to the madness: Sandelowski and Barroso’s Handbook
for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. The Weekly Qualitative Report, 2(2), 8-12.
Dearing, R. (1997.) Higher education in the learning society: Report of the National Committee Of Inquiry Into Higher Education. London: HMSO.
Engel, J. and A. Kuzel (1992). On the idea of what constitutes good qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 2: 504-510.
Garrison D., Anderson T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2): 87-105.
Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L. and Turof, M. (1997). Learning networks: a field Guide
to Teaching and Learning Online. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Harry K. and Perraton, H. (2003). Open and distance learning for the new society,’ In
Higher Education through open and Distance Learning, ed K. Harry. New York: Routledge.
Herson, K., Lloyd, A., Stanier, R. and Sosabowski, M. (2003). Overcoming resistance to networked learning and teaching modalities-A longitudinal comparison of changing teaching staff attitudes towards learning technologies. Pharmacy Education 3(3): 177-189.
Joyes, G. (2000). An evaluation model for supporting higher education lecturers in the integration of new learning technologies. Educational Technology & Society 3(4): 1-14.
Kasiar,J., Schroeder, S. and Holstad, S. (2002). Comparison of traditional and web-based course evaluation processes in a required, team-thought pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 66(3): 268-270.
Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education 29 (1): 89-106.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J, Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K., Bishop, A., Chang, R. and Churchward, A. (200). The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. Proceedings from Ascilite Singapore 2007. http://content.imamu.edu.sa/Scholars/it/net/kennedy.pdf (accessed 26 October 2010).
Kirby, A. Edwards, L. and Hughes A. (2008) Parents’ concerns about children with specific
learning difficulties: insights gained from an online message centre. Support for Learning 23(4), 193-200.
Lefrancois, G. R. (2006). Theories of human learning: What the old woman said. 5th ed. Australia: Thomson Wadsworth.
Maley, M., Harvey J., De Boer W., Scott, N. and Arena, G. (2008) Addressing current problems in teaching pathology to medical students: blended learning. Medical Teacher 30, e1-e9.
Maloch, B. (2002) Scaffolding student talk: One teacher’s role in literature discussion
groups. Reading Research Quarterly 33(1), 94-112.
Makitalo-Siegl, K. (2008). From multiple perspectives to shared understanding: a small group in a online learning environment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52 (1), 77-95.
Maor, D. (2003). The teacher’s role in developing interaction and reflection in an online
learning community. Education Media International. 40 (1/2), 127-138.
Mosenthal, J., Lipson, M., Torncello, S., Russ, B. and Mekkelsen, J. (2004). Contexts and practices of six schools successful in obtaining reading achievement. Elementary School Journal 104, 343-367.
Mutula, S. (2001). Internet access in East Africa: a future outlook. Library Review, 50(1), 2834.
Newell, A. (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peterson, C. and Caverly, D. (2005). Techtalk: Building academic literacy through online discussion forums. Journal of Developmental Education 29(2): 38-39.
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual development from adolescence to adulthood. Human development 15, 1-12.
Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6 (1): 21-40.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, NCB University Press, 9(5).
Rich, D.C., Pitman, A.J., and M. Gosper, A. (2000). Integrating IT-based geography teaching and learning: a Macquarie University case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24(1): 109-115.
Richards, D. and B. Tangney (2008). An informal online learning community for student mental health at university: A preliminary investigation. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 36(1): 81-97.
Richardson, J. and Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous
Learning Networks 7 (1): 68-88.
Rossiter, D. and Bagdon, K. (1999). Embedding the acquisition of technological literacy: A case study. Educational Technology & Society 2(4), 82-91.
Ruey, S. (2010). A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(5): 706-720.
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. and C. Emden (1997). Focus on qualitative methods: Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Techniques. Research in Nursing and Health 20, 365-371.
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm Retrieved 01 February 2011
Stubbs, M. (1976). Language, Schools and Classrooms. London: Methuen.
Swan, K. and Shih, L. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(3): 115-136.
Towers, S., Smith, J. and A. Bruns. (2005). E-learning environments: Generation C – the missing link. In proceedings of Symposium on Teaching Technology in Higher Education: The 24/7 e-University. Perth, Western Australia.
Unlin, P, Robinson, E. and Tolley, E. (2005). Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. (196). Thought and Language. (E. Hamsman & G. Vankan, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Walsh, D. and S. Downe (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50(2): 204-211.
Wellman, G. and Larson, R. (2002). Using web-based prescription simulations as an active learning tool in an integrated practice skills laboratory. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 66(4): 411-415.
Zhang, K., Peng, S. and Hung, J. (2009). Online collaborative learning in a project-based learning environment in Taiwan: a case study on undergraduate students’ perspectives. Educational Media International 46 (2): 123-135.
